Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two Australian coals were heat-treated, and the accessibility of the pore space to CH 4 and CO 2 was investigated. Samples heat-treated at 573 and 673 K exhibit larger adsorption/desorption hysteresis and smaller surface areas (measured by CO 2 adsorption at 273 K) than untreated samples. For samples heat-treated at 773 K, however, the surface area increased by 50% and the hysteresis was lower, compared to untreated samples. These results demonstrate that volatile hydrocarbons at pore mouths are the cause of energy barriers that prevent adsorbing molecules from passing through. A conceptual model is proposed to illustrate changes in activation energy at constricted pore mouths. Also, the results suggest that both adsorption and desorption isotherms should be measured to determine kinetically inaccessible pore spaces in order to correctly estimate CH 4 recovery and CO 2 storage capacity. The results have importance to the problem of estimating CH 4 recovery and CO 2 storage capacity for CO 2 geosequestration as part of a CO 2 -enhanced coal bed methane recovery operation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bae et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: