Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article focuses on the therapeutic process in nature-based therapies (NBTs), shedding light on how the process is perceived, practiced, and evolves, from the perspective of practitioners from various approaches in the field. Building upon current conceptualizations, this study specifically focuses on the natural environment, as the setting and central ingredient in the therapeutic process. To gain a broad and empirically based understanding of the therapeutic process in NBTs, grounded theory methodology was applied. Data included in-depth interviews with 26 experienced practitioners from various NBT approaches worldwide and field observations of six NBT workshops. The findings of this study shed light on a unique experiential therapeutic process involving three main phases that are facilitated in a way that enhances the influence of the natural environment. These include (1) preparation and transition—creating the physical and psychological container for change, (2) engagement and challenge—learning new and expanded ways of being, and (3) meaning making and incorporation, deriving personal meaning from the experience and integration in daily life. These phases are presented in a tentative framework for intervention, underscoring the main objective, methods, tools, and role of practitioner and nature in each phase. The practical implementations of these understandings are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naor et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: