Why the study?
Does adenoviral S100A1 gene delivery improve myocardial contractile function in a postinfarction rat heart failure model?
Does adenoviral S100A1 gene delivery improve myocardial contractile function in a postinfarction rat heart failure model?
Restoration of S100A1 protein levels via gene transfer reverses contractile dysfunction and normalizes calcium handling in a preclinical heart failure model, suggesting a potential novel therapeutic strategy.
Supports S100A1 gene therapy development in HF; leaves open translation beyond rodent models.
Cardiac-restricted overexpression of the Ca(2+)-binding protein S100A1 has been shown to lead to increased myocardial contractile performance in vitro and in vivo. Since decreased cardiac expression of S100A1 is a characteristic of heart failure, we tested the hypothesis that S100A1 gene transfer could restore contractile function of failing myocardium. Adenoviral S100A1 gene delivery normalized S100A1 protein expression in a postinfarction rat heart failure model and reversed contractile dysfunction of failing myocardium in vivo and in vitro. S100A1 gene transfer to failing cardiomyocytes restored diminished intracellular Ca(2+) transients and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+) load mechanistically due to increased SR Ca(2+) uptake and reduced SR Ca(2+) leak. Moreover, S100A1 gene transfer decreased elevated intracellular Na(+) concentrations to levels detected in nonfailing cardiomyocytes, reversed reactivated fetal gene expression, and restored energy supply in failing cardiomyocytes. Intracoronary adenovirus-mediated S100A1 gene delivery in vivo to the postinfarcted failing rat heart normalized myocardial contractile function and Ca(2+) handling, which provided support in a physiological context for results found in myocytes. Thus, the present study demonstrates that restoration of S100A1 protein levels in failing myocardium by gene transfer may be a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Most et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: