Why the study?
Failure to rescue (FTR) measures a center's ability to prevent operative death after a surgical complication, motivating an evaluation of trends in and contributors to FTR after proximal aortic surgery.
In patients undergoing proximal aortic repair, failure to rescue rates increase significantly with each additional postoperative complication, and can be effectively predicted using a 6-variable model.
FTR trends after proximal aortic repair merit institutional monitoring; leaves open generalizability and modifiable contributors beyond single-center data.
Objective: Failure to rescue (FTR) is a metric of postoperative care, measuring a center's ability to prevent operative death after a surgical complication. We evaluated trends in and contributors to FTR after proximal aortic surgery at a high-volume institution. Methods: Of 4180 patients in our single practice who underwent open proximal aortic repair from 1990 to 2024, 1304 (31.2%) had at least 1 of 4 FTR-related complications identified by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Operative death was defined as death within 30 days of surgery or before hospital discharge or transfer. We analyzed FTR rate by specific complication, including the number and combination of complications. We then evaluated the association of elective versus emergency repair and aortic dissection with FTR rate. Finally, a multivariable model was built to predict FTR in these patients. Results: < .001). Neither emergency repair nor acute aortic dissection were significant FTR predictors after adjustment for covariates. A 6-variable predictive model to predict FTR achieved a test C-statistic of 0.79 (0.77-0.81). Conclusions: The FTR rate significantly increased with each additional complication. We built a model that can effectively predict FTR. Better understanding of FTR rates can identify areas for improvement in postoperative care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blackburn et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: