Aims: To develop an outcome questionnaire, the Adaptation to Memory Difficulties Outcome Questionnaire, on the effectiveness of memory rehabilitation. Methods: An initial pool of items was identified through observations and qualitative interviews with participants receiving memory rehabilitation. A 45-item version of the questionnaire was posted to people with traumatic brain injury and multiple sclerosis. A second copy was posted to those who agreed to be reassessed 2 weeks later. Results: The questionnaire was returned by 141 people. Some items were removed due to poor response distributions. Principal component analysis indicated that the questionnaire comprised five subscales: i) memory knowledge; ii) control; iii) emotional adjustment; iv) internal memory aids; v) external memory aids. Internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha=0.74–0.84). Test–retest reliability was assessed on 50 participants completing a second questionnaire within a 4-week interval and was shown to be satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha=0.67–0.86). There was no significant association between subscale scores and age, gender, diagnosis or time since onset. Conclusions: The questionnaire may be used as a measure of the effect of memory problems, tailored to the aims of memory rehabilitation. Responsiveness to change needs to be assessed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chouliara et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: