Why the study?
Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapies may adversely affect cancer survival, so evaluating the prevalence of classical cardiovascular risk factors before systemic treatment can identify patients at increased risk.
Patients with a new diagnosis of cancer qualifying for systemic treatment have a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary cardio-oncology care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High CV risk factor prevalence in de novo cancer patients supports early cardio-oncology evaluation; leaves open whether it improves outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Cancer therapies are currently more efficient at increasing the survival of patients (pts) with cancer. Unfortunately, the cardiovascular (CV) complications of cancer therapies may adversely affect improving results of treatment. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of classical CV risk factors among pts with de novo diagnosis of cancer and thus identify the cohort of pts with potentially increased future risk of CV complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis is based on the database of the multicentre ONCOECHO study. Pts before systemic treatment (chemotherapy or targeted therapy) were included. The diagnostic datasets of resting electrocardiogram, blood samples, and transthoracic echocardiogram were analysed in 343 consecutive pts who were free from any cardiovascular disease that could adversely affect the introduced treatment. The comparison with the NATPOL population data showed that our pts were more often smokers, hypertensives, and diabetics, but less frequently presented with hypercholesterolaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with new diagnosis of cancer, who are candidates for potentially cardiotoxic medical treatment, have increased prevalence of significant cardiovascular risk factors and therefore should be followed by a multidisciplinary team during the therapeutic process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nowakowska et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: