Why the study?
Does AT1 receptor antagonism reduce renal growth in fetal sheep?
Does AT1 receptor antagonism reduce renal growth in fetal sheep?
AT1 receptor antagonism in fetal sheep leads to renal growth retardation and increased AT2 receptor protein expression.
May impair fetal renal growth with AT1 antagonism in sheep; leaves open relevance to human pregnancy.
The actions of angiotensin II on type 1 (AT₁) and type 2 (AT₂) receptor subtypes are important for normal kidney development before birth. This study investigated the effect of AT₁ receptor antagonism on renal growth and growth regulators in fetal sheep during late gestation. From 125 days of gestation (term 145±2 days), chronically catheterised sheep fetuses were infused intravenously for 5 days with either an AT₁-specific receptor antagonist (GR138950, 2-4 mg/kg per day, n=5) or saline (0.9% NaCl, n=5). Blockade of the AT₁ receptor decreased arterial blood oxygenation and pH and increased blood pCO₂, haemoglobin and lactate, and plasma cortisol and IGF-II. Blood glucose and plasma thyroid hormones and IGF-I were unchanged between the treatment groups. On the 5th day of infusion, the kidneys of the GR-treated fetuses were lighter than those of the control fetuses, both in absolute and relative terms, and were smaller in transverse cross-sectional width and cortical thickness. In the GR-infused fetuses, renal AT₂ receptor protein concentration and glomerular density were significantly greater than in the saline-infused fetuses. Blockade of the AT₁ receptor had no effect on relative cortical thickness, fractional or mean glomerular volumes, or renal protein levels of the AT₁ receptor, IGF type 1 receptor, insulin receptor or protein kinase C ζ. Therefore, in the ovine fetus, AT₁ receptor antagonism causes increased renal protein expression of the AT₂ receptor subtype, which, combined with inhibition of AT₁ receptor activity, may be partly responsible for growth retardation of the developing kidney.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Forhead et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: