Small-Carrion Penile Prosthesis: A Report on 160 Cases and Review of the Literature

No AccessJournal of UrologyCLINICAL UROLOGY: Milestone in Urology1 Jun 2002Small-Carrion Penile Prosthesis: A Report on 160 Cases and Review of the Literature MICHAEL P. SMALL MICHAEL P. SMALLMICHAEL P. SMALL More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64984-1AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail The use of the Small-Carrion penile prosthesis in 160 patients is evaluated. Methods to determine those patients who will benefit from the use of this prosthesis and the size prosthesis needed are discussed. Suggestions are made on how to handle problems or complications that may occur during or after the operation, as well as the antibiotic regimen. The literature is reviewed. From the Department of Urology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida (Reprinted from J Urol, 119: 365–368, 1978) References 1 : Small-Carrion operation for impotence. Urology1976; 7: 68. Google Scholar 2 : Small-Carrion penile prosthesis. Urology1975; 5: 479. Google Scholar 3 : Sleep-related penile tumescence as a function of age. Amer J Psychiat1976; 132: 9. Google Scholar 4 : Conference on penile prostheses. New York: New York Academy of MedicineOctober 1976. Google Scholar 5 Kaufman, J. J.: Panel discussion on impotence. American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois, October 1976. Google Scholar 6 : Psychologic evaluation of impotent men. Mayo Clin Proc1976; 51: 363. Google Scholar 7 : Complications of perineal prostatectomy. In: Complications of Urologic Surgery. Edited by . Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.1976: 261. Google Scholar 8 : Experience with implantation of the Small-Carrion penile implant for organic impotence. J Urol1976; 116: 49. Link, Google Scholar 9 : Experience with the Small-Carrion penile prosthesis. J Urol1976; 115: 280. Link, Google Scholar 10 : Experience with the Small-Carrion penile prosthesis in the treatment of organic impotence. J Urol1976; 115: 277. Link, Google Scholar 11 Ambrose, R.: Personal communication, January 1976. Google Scholar 12 : Use of implantable prosthesis for the treatment of urinary incontinence and impotence. Amer J Surg1975; 130: 244. Google Scholar © 2002 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 167Issue 6June 2002Page: 2357-2360 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2002 by American Urological Association, Inc.Metrics Author Information MICHAEL P. SMALL More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...