The pulse amperometric detection (PAD) of electroactive metal ions separated in 25-μm-i.d. capillaries has been investigated with a bipolar waveform. The metal ions were detected at Au and Pt 25-μm disk electrodes via both cathodic deposition and anodic stripping. Analyte response was averaged over multiples of 24 ms to minimize 42-Hz noise associated with the detection system; the frequency of the applied waveform was 5−8 Hz. The response of freshly polished electrodes was constant within 30 min of application of the pulse waveform. Comparison with constant-voltage detection showed that the pulsed detection system gave superior stability, and detector stability was consistent within 5% over a 14-h period. Detection limits in cathodic analysis for Tl(I), Pb(II), Zn(II), Ni(II), and Co(II) were 2−3 μmol/L; for Cd(II) and Hg(II), 5−7 μmol/L; for Ag(I), 11 μmol/L; and for Cu(II), 20 μmol/L. The maximum change in response factors was 10% from 50 μmol/L to 1000 μmol/L. For anodic analysis, detection limits for Tl(I), Pb(II), Zn(II), and Cd(II) were 0.2−0.5 μmol/L; and for Co(II) and Ni(II), 0.6−1.0 μmol/L. Response factors were constant to within 10% over the range of 5−500 μmol/L. Sample stacking to enhance detection for metal ions was also studied, with optimal conditions for linear calibration at electrolyte concentrations about 7−8 times less than that used for the electrophoretic separations. Response factors were constant to <±5% over 1.0−100.0 μmol/L, and detection limits were more than 10-fold smaller than those for nonstacking analysis. A comparison of PAD for spiked and real snow samples with atomic absorption spectrometry showed good agreement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wen et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: