Why the study?
LVEF is the standard tool to assess LV systolic function, but GLS has been suggested as superior, prompting an evaluation of both methods to detect LV systolic dysfunction in patients with ESRD and severe hyperparathyroidism.
Does global longitudinal strain (GLS) improve the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction compared to LVEF in asymptomatic patients with ESRD and severe hyperparathyroidism?
Does global longitudinal strain (GLS) improve the detection of left ventricular systolic dysfunction compared to LVEF in asymptomatic patients with ESRD and severe hyperparathyroidism?
Global longitudinal strain is a more sensitive tool than LVEF for detecting subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with ESRD and severe hyperparathyroidism.
BACKGROUND: The estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by 2D echocardiography (2D-ECHO) is the most used tool to assess LV systolic function (LVSF). Global longitudinal strain (GLS) has recently been suggested as a superior method for several evaluations. This study explored the association and prevalence of LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD) by using these methods in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and severe hyperparathyroidism (SHPTH); both associated with cardiovascular events (CEs). AIM: To evaluate the myocardial function in patients with ESRD and SHPTH by using the GLS and LVEF measured through conventional 2D-ECHO. METHODS: In 62 patients with ESRD and SHPTH, asymptomatic, and without a history of CEs, LVSF was evaluated by 2D-ECHO, obtaining the EF, by the Simpson biplane method, and GLS by speckle tracking. RESULTS: The total patients with ESRD had a preserved LVEF (> 50%) but abnormal GLS (< 13.55%). Additionally, multivariate analysis showed an independent association of GLS and serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), LV mass index, and hemoglobin. Also, PTH was independently associated with lateral e' wave and tricuspid regurgitation velocity. CONCLUSION: In patients with SHPTH linked to ESRD, the use of GLS by 2D-ECHO is a more sensitive tool than LVEF for detecting LVSD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrasco-Ruiz et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: