AIM: To characterize the clinical and immunological features of HLA-typed youth with pediatric onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHOD: One hundred and seven patients with clinically diagnosed T2DM (aged ≤20 yr at diagnosis) were examined. DNA and serum, obtained after a median diabetes duration of 2.2 (Q1-Q3: 0.8-4.6) yr, were used for centralized HLA-typing and autoantibody (GADA, IA-2A, ZnT8A) measurements. RESULTS: 64.6% of patients were female and median age at diagnosis was 13.8 (Q1-Q3: 11.6-15.4) yr. Patients were obese [median body mass index-standard deviation score (BMI-SDS): 2.6 (2.0-3.1)], 88.0% had a family history of diabetes and 40.2% a migration background. Islet autoantibodies were detected in 16 (15.0%), among which 7 (6.5%) had multiple islet autoantibodies. Autoantibody positive patients had poorer metabolic control than autoantibody negative patients [glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): 8.1 (6.9-10.1) % vs. 6.6 (5.9-8.0) %; p = 0.033], while patients with HLA-DR genetic risk had higher BMI-SDS than those with HLA-DRXX [2.6 (2.4-3.7) vs. 2.4 (1.7-2.9); p = 0.007]. Metabolic syndrome (61.7%), microalbuminuria (13.4%), and retinopathy (3.9%) were diagnosed. Therapies used were lifestyle only (35.5%), oral anti-diabetics (OAD) only (43.3 %), insulin + OAD (15.9%) and insulin only (5.6%). Patients with β-cell autoimmunity or HLA-DR genetic risk more frequently used insulin than confirmed T2DM patients (50.0 vs. 22.0%; p = 0.037) and less often had diabetic relatives (61.1 vs. 86.0%; p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: T2DM was confirmed in about 90% of patients while about 10% with β-cell autoimmunity or HLA-DR genetic risk likely had either T1.5DM or 'double diabetes' or an unknown diabetes type.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Awa et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: