Why the study?
Patient satisfaction surveys help evaluate and improve services, but continuous evaluation from the patient perspective was needed to assess perioperative care in a neuro-theatre suite.
A service evaluation in a Scottish neuro-theatre suite demonstrated 98.8% overall patient satisfaction with perioperative care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Patient feedback may inform local perioperative improvements in neuro-theatre; leaves open generalizability and outcome impact.
A positive patient experience and person-centred care is at the forefront of all healthcare services and is linked to improved health outcomes. Patient satisfaction surveys are used widely to measure patient experiences and satisfaction with hospitals and can help to evaluate and improve services. This article presents a service evaluation from the patient perspective of their perioperative experience in a neuro-theatre suite of one hospital in Scotland. A patient questionnaire was used to evaluate factors that impact on the patient experience, including service quality, staff/patient interaction, comfort and needs, fears and concerns and information provision. A total of 97 responses to the questionnaire were received and findings showed 98.8% overall satisfaction with the care. Continuous evaluation of services is vital to understanding patient satisfaction with services provided by nurses, thus helping to improve the services. The gap in literature highlights the importance of continuing to use this tool within the perioperative neuro-theatre setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilson et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: