Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated CBCT-derived volumetric changes in the upper airway after maxillary expansion in growing patients with maxillary deficiency (transverse and/or sagittal). Methods A literature search was performed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis, Wiley Online Library, and Sage Journals until May 2026. Data extraction and methodological quality assessments were performed independently by two reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for randomized controlled trials and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for non-randomized studies. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software was used to synthesize standardized mean differences (SMDs) for airway volume changes. This meta-analysis was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025118257). Results Thirteen studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and 12 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. Maxillary expansion was associated with a significant increase in nasal cavity volume (SMD = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.16; p < 0.001), nasopharyngeal airway volume (SMD = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.97; p < 0.001), and oropharyngeal airway volume (SMD = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.42 to 0.66; p < 0.001). Nasal cavity volume showed the largest pooled effect; however, substantial heterogeneity was observed for nasopharyngeal and nasal cavity outcomes. Conclusion Maxillary expansion was associated with significant CBCT-derived volumetric increases in upper airway dimensions in growing patients, with the largest effect observed in the nasal cavity. However, the clinical significance, long-term stability, and relationship of these volumetric changes to functional respiratory outcomes remain uncertain and require further investigation through prospective controlled trials with validated respiratory endpoints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amly et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: