Why the study?
Does posterior capsule tightness correlate with range of motion loss in patients with shoulder impingement compared to healthy controls?
Does posterior capsule tightness correlate with range of motion loss in patients with shoulder impingement compared to healthy controls?
The study biometrically quantifies posterior capsule tightness in shoulder impingement, showing a significant correlation with loss of internal rotation range of motion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports association of posterior tightness with internal rotation loss in impingement; hypothesis-generating for causality and intervention trials.
The relationship between posterior capsule tightness and dysfunction has long been recognized clinically but has not been biometrically quantified. The purpose of this study was to quantify changes in range of motion and posterior capsule tightness in patients with dominant or nondominant shoulder impingement. Measurements of posterior capsule tightness and external and internal rotation range of motion were made in 31 patients with shoulder impingement and in 33 controls without shoulder abnormality. Patients with impingement in the nondominant arm had increased posterior capsule tightness and decreased internal and external rotation range of motion compared with controls. Patients with impingement in their dominant arm had increased posterior capsule tightness and reduced internal rotation range of motion but no significant loss of external rotation range of motion compared with controls. Posterior capsule tightness in impingement patients showed a significant correlation with loss of internal rotation range of motion. Patients with shoulder impingement in their nondominant arm had a more global loss of range of motion compared with patients having impingement in their dominant arm. We believe we have described a valid clinical measurement for identifying posterior capsule tightness in patients with shoulder impingement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tyler et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: