An examinee-level (or conditional) reliability is proposed for use in both classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT). The well-known group-level reliability is shown to be the average of conditional reliabilities of examinees in a group or a population. This relationship is similar to the known relationship between the square of the conditional standard error of measurement (SEM) and the square of the group-level SEM. The proposed conditional reliability is illustrated with an empirical data set in the CTT and IRT frameworks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raju et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: