This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by surgical resection is the standard treatment for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.The optimal timing for surgery after NAT, however, is unclear.Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed 83 patients who underwent NAT followed by resection between January 2018 and December 2021.Results: Before NAT, 22.9% of patients had resectable disease, 57.8% had borderline resectable disease, and 19.3% had locally advanced disease.After NAT, 26.5% of patients showed a downstaging of their clinical stage.After NAT, median CA 19-9 levels decreased from 148.0 to 31.7, mean tumor size from 3.1 to 2.3 cm, and the mean PET-CT maximum standardized uptake value from 6.3 to 3.6.Three-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 46.7% and 22.6%, respectively.RFS and OS were significantly associated with CA 19-9 levels, lymph node metastasis, and postsurgical pathological stage, while OS was also significantly associated with tumor size and NAT.Patients with elevated CA 19-9 (> 37) which normalized after NAT showed a 3-year RFS of 32.5% compared to 0.0% in those who did not.In patients with elevated CA 19-9, OSs were 58.3% and 25.0% for those with a post-NAT decrease of ≥70% vs. those with no decrease, respectively, while RFSs were 22.6% and 0%.Conclusion: Timing of surgery after NAT should be decided considering post-NAT tumor size and CA 19-9 levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chae et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: