Why the study?
Practice guidelines recommend resuming oral feeding immediately after gastrointestinal surgery, but many practitioners remain reluctant to order early oral feeding.
Does early oral feeding improve tolerance and reduce postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective bowel surgery compared to delayed feeding?
Does early oral feeding improve tolerance and reduce postoperative complications in patients undergoing elective bowel surgery compared to delayed feeding?
Early oral feeding after bowel surgery may shorten hospitalization but does not reduce postoperative complications, and up to 25% of patients may not tolerate it early.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
EOF well tolerated in ~86% with faster bowel recovery and shorter stays; reinforces guidelines and supports routine adoption.
Although practice guidelines recommend resuming oral feeding immediately after gastrointestinal surgery, many practitioners remain reluctant to order early oral feeding (EOF). Therefore, this review aimed to clarify the tolerance to and postoperative outcomes with EOF among patients undergoing bowel surgery. A systematic review of the literature published between January 1990 and July 2022 with the time of oral intake (early or delayed until resolution of ileus) as the exposure variable was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases. Outcomes of interest included tolerance to EOF and postoperative adverse effects or complications. After screening 1,667 research articles, 18 randomized control trials, six prospective case series, and four cohort studies met our inclusion criteria, collectively representing data from 2,647 patients in eleven countries. These studies indicate that while most patients tolerate EOF, 5-25% may not tolerate EOF until the fourth postoperative day (POD). Moreover, EOF, at best, has no advantage over delayed feeding in terms of vomiting, nausea, nasogastric tube requirement, or other postoperative complications. In addition, early return of bowel function, lower risk of diarrhea, and lower pain score with EOF are inconsistently reported, and shorter hospitalization with EOF may be limited to those who tolerate oral feeding on POD 0 or 1. Nevertheless, shorter hospitalization with EOF could reduce the cost of hospitalization. A substantial number of patients may not be able to tolerate oral feeding after bowel surgery until POD 4, and in patients who tolerate EOF, the only clear benefit is a shorter length of hospitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mvoula et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: