Why the study?
How does the duration of rapid ventricular pacing influence ventricular refractoriness in the presence of propafenone and lidocaine in isolated guinea pig hearts?
How does the duration of rapid ventricular pacing influence ventricular refractoriness in the presence of propafenone and lidocaine in isolated guinea pig hearts?
Propafenone and lidocaine exhibit different use-dependent effects on intraventricular conduction and refractoriness during rapid ventricular pacing in isolated guinea pig hearts.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Slower use-dependent conduction slowing with propafenone than lidocaine in guinea pig hearts; leaves open translation to human pacing or antiarrhythmic therapy.
Propafenone and lidocaine have a rate dependent negative dromotropic effect on intraventricular conduction. We investigated the use dependent actions of propafenone and lidocaine on intraventricular conduction in isolated guinea pig hearts perfused by the method of Langendorff. Of primary interest was how the number of stimuli of the conditioning train (S1) might influence the ventricular effective refractory period (VERP) when refractoriness is assessed at a high pacing rate. Propafenone (0.3 microM) and lidocaine (50 microM) caused a comparable prolongation of the intraventricular conduction time during sinus rhythm. During ventricular pacing in the presence of propafenone an abrupt decrease of the pacing cycle length (220 to 120 ms) resulted in an initial peak of rate dependent prolongation of the QRS interval that subsequently decreased to a stable steady-state level. Lidocaine also induced a rate dependent increase of the intraventricular conduction time up to a steady-state level. The time constant, characterizing the changes of the intraventricular conduction time after shortening the ventricular pacing cycle length from 220 to 120 ms was significantly (P < 0.01) longer in the presence of propafenone (tau = 31 +/- 4 beats; mean +/- SEM; n = 11) than for lidocaine (tau = 3 +/- 1; n = 10). Both drugs caused the greatest increase of the VERP when the number of conditioning stimuli (S1, interstimulus interval = 120 ms) was in the range of their respective time constant. However, when the number of conditioning stimuli was further increased, VERP progressively diminished. These effects may be explained by a shortening of the action potential during high rates that results in a decreased binding of propafenone to Na+ channels and by the direct shortening of repolarization period by lidocaine (Class IB drug).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stark et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: