Why the study?
Does a new computer-aided clinical decision support system accurately predict the success of post-DCE cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Does a new computer-aided clinical decision support system accurately predict the success of post-DCE cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
A novel computational approach using multiresolution signal decomposition can highly accurately predict the success of direct-current cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
May warrant validation trials before guiding cardioversion decisions in persistent AF; leaves open clinical utility.
We propose a new algorithm to predict the outcome of direct-current electric (DCE) cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. AF is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and DCE cardioversion is a noninvasive treatment to end AF and return the patient to sinus rhythm (SR). Unfortunately, there is a high risk of AF recurrence in persistent AF patients; hence clinically it is important to predict the DCE outcome in order to avoid the procedure's side effects. This study develops a feature extraction and classification framework to predict AF recurrence patients from the underlying structure of atrial activity (AA). A multiresolution signal decomposition technique, based on matching pursuit (MP), was used to project the AA over a dictionary of wavelets. Seven novel features were derived from the decompositions and were employed in a quadratic discrimination analysis classification to predict the success of post-DCE cardioversion in 40 patients with persistent AF. The proposed algorithm achieved 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity, indicating that the proposed computational approach captures detailed structural information about the underlying AA and could provide reliable information for effective management of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: