Introduction In adult fractures the injury severity and fracture pattern are important. In pediatric fractures another component is added—the phenomenon of growth. Previous classifications of children’s fractures are very specific, but not universal in application 1–6 and none have been mscientifically validated.7–9 Finally, there is no classification system available for diaphyseal long bone fractures. Any classification for pediatric fractures must be applicable for all fractures and recognize the importance of growth through the epiphyseal plate. To address these needs, the validated AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (PCCF)1 was introduced to the AO/OTA Compendium of Fractures and Dislocations in 2007.10–12 The principles and definitions of the pediatric long bone fracture classification The terminology and coding of the PCCF are based on the principles found in Müller’s Long Bone Comprehensive Classification of Fractures.13 This system only addresses the four long bones. Bone The bones are coded: Humerus (1), Radius (2r), Ulna (2u), Femur (3), Tibia (4t) and Fibula (4f) (Fig 1). Note that the paired bones radius/ ulna or tibia/fibula are classified as individual bones (Fig 2) allowing the detailed documentation of combined fractures of the radius and ulna, or the tibia and fibula.Fig 1: Designation of bone location.Fig 2: Coding of same fracture but different bone in paired bones.Fracture location The location within the bones is the proximal end segment (1), diaphyseal segment (2), and, distal end segment (3). The end segment consists of the epiphysis and metaphysis. The metaphyseal end segment is determined by a square whose sides are the same length as the widest part of the visible epiphyseal growth plate (Fig 3).11 For the radius/ulna and tibia/fibula, both bones must be included in the square.Fig 3: Definition of bone segments and types. For children, the square must be placed over the larger part of the physis.Consequently, the three segments can be defined as: • Proximal end segment (1) and distal end segment (3) – Subsegments are the epiphysis (E) and metaphysis (square) (M) • Diaphyseal segment (2) – Subsegment is the section between two end segments (D). Malleolar fractures are infrequent in children and do not justify a specific coding. They are simply coded as distal end segment tibia and/or fibula fractures. The subsegments follow the segment and are the diaphysis (D), metaphysis (M) and epiphysis (E) (Fig 3). Epiphyseal fractures are by definition intraarticular fractures. (Fig 3 and Fig 4). The square definition is not applied to the proximal femur where metaphyseal fractures are located between the physis of the head and the intertrochanteric line.Fig 4: Use of the square patterns to classify a fracture as epiphyseal E), metaphyseal (M) or diaphyseal (D). The square patterns are copied onto a transparency sheet and applied over the radiograph for more reliable and accurate diagnosis.Fracture displacement may distort the fracture fragment’s exact anatomy so the end segment square may not be accurate necessitating reclassification after the fracture reduction. Child code A forward slash “/” (Fig 5) is used to identify the specific child fracture codes: Epiphyseal fracture codes (Fig 6) Specific metaphyseal fracture child codes (Fig 7) Specific diaphyseal fracture child codes (Fig 8) Fig 5: Overall structure of the pediatric fracture classificationFig 6: Definition of child patterns for epiphyseal fractures.Fig 7: Definition of child patterns for metaphyseal fractures.Fig 8: Definition of child patterns for diaphyseal fractures.Fracture severity code This code distinguishes between two grades of fracture severity: simple (.1) and multifragmentary (.2) (Fig 9).Fig 9: Severity implies anticipated difficulties and method of treatment, not the prognosis.Qualifications These codes are added as roman numerals between rounded brackets at the end of the fracture code, eg 13-M/3.1(III). These are described by an additional code for the grade of angulation. Humerus 1 Proximal epiphyseal fractures 11-E Proximal metaphyseal fractures 11-M Diaphyseal fractures 12-D Distal metaphyseal fractures 13-M Distal epiphyseal fractures 13-E Radius/ulna 2 Proximal epiphyseal fractures 21-E Isolated fractures of the radius *Qualifications for displaced radial head and neck fractures: Type I No angulation and no displacement Type II Angulation with displacement of up to half of the bone diameter Type III Angulation with displacement of more than half of the bone diameter Proximal metaphyseal fractures 21-M Isolated fractures of the radius Diaphyseal fractures 22-D Fractures of both bones Isolated fractures of the radius Isolated fractures of the ulna Isolated fractures of the radius Distal metaphyseal fractures 23-M Fractures of both bones Isolated fractures of the radius Isolated fractures of the ulna Distal epiphyseal fractures 23-E Fractures of both bones Isolated fractures of the radius 23-E Isolated fractures of the ulna 23-E 3 Femur Proximal epiphyseal fractures 31-E Proximal metaphyseal fractures 31-M Diaphyseal fractures 32-D Distal metaphyseal fractures 33-M Distal epiphyseal fractures 33-E Tibia/fibula 4 Proximal epiphyseal fractures 41-E Isolated fractures of the tibia Proximal metaphyseal fractures 41-M Fractures of both bones Isolated fractures of the tibia Isolated fractures of the fibula Diaphyseal fractures 42-D Fractures of both bones Isolated fractures of the tibia Isolated fractures of the fibula Distal metaphyseal fractures 43-M Fractures of both bones Isolated fractures of the tibia Isolated fractures of the fibula Distal epiphyseal fractures 43-E Fractures of both bones Isolated fracture of the tibia Isolated fractures of the fibula Frequent fracture combinations Radius/ulna Tibia/fibula
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2017 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: