Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study the design of interventions to stabilize financial markets plagued by adverse selection. Our contribution is to analyze the information revealed by participation decisions. Taking part in a government program carries a stigma, and outside options are mechanism dependent. We show that the efficiency of an intervention can be assessed by its impact on the market interest rate. The presence of an outside market determines the nature of optimal interventions and the choice of financial instruments (debt guarantees in our model), but it does not affect implementation costs. (JEL D82, D86, G01, G20, G31)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philippon et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: