Why the study?
The study investigated the prognostic value of NT-proBNP in connection with ventricular extrasystoles in patients with diabetes mellitus and ACS after successful PCI.
Does the NT-proBNP level on the first day after PCI predict long-term ventricular extrasystoles in young and middle-aged diabetic patients with ACS?
Does the NT-proBNP level on the first day after PCI predict long-term ventricular extrasystoles in young and middle-aged diabetic patients with ACS?
Elevated NT-proBNP on the first day after PCI for ACS independently predicts the long-term risk of ventricular extrasystoles in young and middle-aged patients with diabetes.
May support NTproBNP-VES risk stratification in diabetic ACS post-PCI; leaves open validation in prospective cohorts.
The article investigates the prognostic value of pro-B-type N-terminal natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) in connection with ventricular extrasystoles (VES) in a population of patients with diabetes mellitus with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after successful coronary reperfusion by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients with ACS were examined by defining biomarkers and performing echocardiography (EchoCG) on the first day of ACS after PCI with stenting of the infarction-related coronary artery, and Holter monitoring of electrocardiography (HM-ECG) on the second day after PCI; 12 months later, EchoCG, HM-ECG and NT-proBNP determination were repeated. It was found that the incidence of VES in the long-term prognosis among ACS patients with diabetes of young and middle age was more frequent than in patients without diabetes. A positive correlation was found between the NTproBNP level and ventricular arrhythmia in ACS patients with diabetes mellitus. It has been proven that a high level of NT-proBNP on the first day in patients with ACS after PCI as an independent indicator of risk to development of VES in long-term prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: