Core–shell poly(butadiene‐ graft ‐styrene) (PB‐ g ‐PS) rubber particles were synthesized with different initiation systems by emulsion grafting polymerization. These initiation systems included the redox initiators and an oil‐soluble initiator, 1,2‐azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN). Then the PB‐ g ‐PS impact modifiers were blended with polystyrene (PS) to prepare the PS/PB‐ g ‐PS blends. In the condition of the same tensile yield strength on both samples, the Izod test showed that the notched impact strength of PS/PB‐ g ‐PS(AIBN) was 237.8 J/m, almost 7 times than that of the PS/PB‐ g ‐PS(redox) blend, 37.2 J/m. From transmission electron microscope (TEM) photographs, using the redox initiators, some microphase PS zones existed in the core of PB rubber particles, which is called “internal‐grafting.” This grafting way was inefficient on toughening. However, using AIBN as initiator, a great scale of PS subinclusion was seen within the PB particle core, and this microstructure increased the effective volume fraction of the rubber phase with a result of improving the toughness of modified polystyrene. The dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) on both samples showed that the glass transition temperature ( T g ) of rubber phase of PS/PB‐ g ‐PS(AIBN) was lower than that of PS/PB‐g‐PS(redox). As a result, the PB‐ g ‐PS(AIBN) had better toughening efficiency on modified polystyrene than the PB‐ g ‐PS(redox), which accorded with the Kerner approximate equation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: