Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A bacterial strain, designated GEM5 T , was isolated from sand soil samples from the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. The polyphasic study confirmed the affiliation of the isolate with the genus Massilia . GEM5 T had Gram-stain-negative, non-spore-forming and rod-shaped cells and grew at 4–30 °C, pH 6–8 and with 0–2 % (w/v) NaCl. Its cell wall contained ribose. Q8 was the predominant respiratory quinone, and summed feature 3 (C 16 : 1 ω6 c /ω7 c ) and C 16 : 0 were the major components of the fatty acids. The polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, an unidentified phospholipid, an unidentified aminolipid and four unidentified lipids. The DNA G+C content was 65.1 mol%. The phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene showed a stable clade being formed by GEM5 T , Massilia timonae CCUG 45783 T (97.94 %) and Massilia oculi CCUG 43427A T (97.58 %). The average nucleotide identity (ANIb) values between GEM5 T and M. timonae CCUG 45783 T , M.oculi CCUG 43427A T were 91.3 and 91.7 %, respectively. On the basis of the morphological, physiological and chemotaxonomic pattern, it was proposed that strain GEM5 T (=JCM 32744 T =CICC 24458 T ) should be classified as representing a member of the genus Massilia with the name Massilia arenae sp. nov.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: