The contribution of this paper is twofold: we study power utility maximization problems (with and without intermediate consumption) in a partially observed financial market with jumps and we solve by the innovation method the arising filtering problem. We consider a Markovian model where the risky asset dynamics S t follows a pure jump process whose local characteristics are not observable by investors. More precisely, the stock price process dynamics depends on an unobservable stochastic factor X t described by a jump-diffusion process. We assume that agents' decisions are based on the knowledge of an information flow, [Formula: see text], containing the asset price history, [Formula: see text]. Using projection on the filtration [Formula: see text], the partially observable investment-consumption problem is reduced to a full observable stochastic control problem. The homogeneity of the power utility functions leads to a factorization of the associated value process into a part depending on the current wealth and the so called opportunity process J t . In the case where [Formula: see text], J t and the optimal investment-consumption strategy are represented in terms of solutions to a backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE) driven by the [Formula: see text]-compensated martingale random measure associated to S t , which can be obtained by filtering techniques (Ceci, 2006; Ceci and Gerardi, 2006). Next, we extend the study to the case [Formula: see text], where η t gives observations of X t in additional Gaussian noise. This setup can be viewed as an abstract form of "insider information". The opportunity process J t is now characterized as a solution to a BSDE driven by the [Formula: see text]-compensated martingale random measure and the so called innovation process. Computation of these quantities leads to a filtering problem with mixed type observation and whose solution is discussed via the innovation approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Claudia Ceci (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: