Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Western culture, sexual fidelity is widely regarded as a prime source of relationship stability and personal happiness and thus a worthy practice. This article is an empirical and critical account of monogamous coupledom as a privileged relational experience. Data are drawn from 14 in-depth interviews with Australian men and women who self-identified their cross- or same-sex partnerships as sexually and emotionally monogamous. Monogamy, as participants construct it, is critiqued as an action and policy that produces an exclusive and contained essence of relationships and that guards against a perceived chaotic excess that is set-up in opposition to it. Such action is seen to impel a sense of mastery in relationships and selves that are properly enclosed, channelled and thereby ordered. The sociohistoric binary arrangement of an ordered inside and chaotic outside is focused on as enabling a superior monogamous order while also underpinning its precariousness and psychological frailty. Drawing on Deleuzian ideas about a non-privileged and non-hierarchical system of relating, an alternative way of intimately connecting with others is brought into theoretical view, one that does not favour contained and fixed essences as foundations for relationships, intimate connections and life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark Finn (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: