Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 15, 1992Annals of Internal Medicine

Subcutaneous Heparin Compared with Continuous Intravenous Heparin Administration in the Initial Treatment of Deep Vein Thrombosis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ABA. Bura-RivièreUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1Lucia MazzolaiLucia MazzolaiVascular MedicineHarry R. BüllerHarry R. BüllerVascular Medicine

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Bura-Rivière et al. (1992) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a87d05502f504243ce9648dhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-116-4-279
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Subcutaneous calcium heparin versus intravenous sodium heparin in treatment of established acute deep vein thrombosis of the legs: a multicentre prospective randomised trial.1987 · 47 citations
  2. 2Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease1959 · 14,778 citations
  3. 3Subcutaneous vs Intravenous Heparin in the Treatment of Deep Venous Thrombosis – A Randomized Clinical Trial1990 · 83 citations
  4. 4Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine.1991 · 3,491 citations
  5. 5Adjusted Subcutaneous Heparin or Continuous Intravenous Heparin in Patients with Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis1987 · 172 citations