FEW scientific papers have given rise to more controversy than that in which Wildiers [1901] described "bios." After nearly thirty years of investigation, a review of the literature provides little or no satisfactory evidence of the essential nature of "bios" and only a series of widely conflicting statements regarding its chemical nature and properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bindiganavale Tirumalachar Narayanan (1930) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: