Why the study?
It was questioned whether 24 h Holter ECG monitoring should be used to evaluate patients admitted with syncope in internal medicine departments.
Does 24 h Holter ECG monitoring provide high diagnostic yield in unselected patients admitted with syncope to internal medicine departments?
Does 24 h Holter ECG monitoring provide high diagnostic yield in unselected patients admitted with syncope to internal medicine departments?
Routine 24-hour Holter monitoring for syncope in internal medicine wards has a low diagnostic yield (5.2%) and should be targeted to patients with a high pre-test probability.
Low yield in unselected syncope patients cautions against routine Holter use; supports targeted application in older patients or HFpEF but leaves open need for prospective validation.
Physicians use Holter electrocardiography (ECG) monitoring to evaluate some patients with syncope in the internal medicine department. We questioned whether Holter ECG should be used in the presented setting. Included were all consecutive patients admitted with syncope to one of our nine internal medicine departments who had completed a 24 h Holter ECG between 2018 and 2021. A diagnostic Holter was defined as one which altered the patient’s treatment and met ESC/ACC/AHA diagnostic criteria. A total of 478 Holter tests were performed for syncope evaluation during admission to an internal medicine department in the study period. Of them, 25 patients (5.2%) had a diagnostic Holter finding. Sinus node dysfunction was the most frequent diagnostic recording (13 patients, 52%). In multivariant analysis, predictors for diagnostic Holter were older age (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.08−1.68), heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.43−11.72), and shorter duration to Holter initiation (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56−0.96). There was a positive correlation between time from admission to Holter and hospital stay, r(479) = 0.342, p < 0.001. Our results suggest that completing a 24 h Holter monitoring during admission to the internal medicine department should be restricted to patients with a high pre-test probability to avoid overuse and possible harm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freund et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: