Why the study?
Does left atrial plication improve left ventricular function in patients with mitral valve stenosis and a giant left atrium?
Does left atrial plication improve left ventricular function in patients with mitral valve stenosis and a giant left atrium?
Left atrial plication in patients with mitral stenosis and giant left atrium significantly improves left ventricular function and reduces left atrial size.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support left atrial plication for LV gains in giant LA mitral stenosis; hypothesis-generating, needs RCTs before practice change.
Left atrial plication (LAP) following Kawazoe's method was performed on eight patients with mitral valve stenosis associated with a giant left atrium. To investigate the effect of LAP particularly on left ventricular function, the preoperative and postoperative left ventricular function in these patients were compared. The data were also compared to that of the non-left atrial plication (non-LAP) group with left atrial dimension of 60 mm or over. In the LAP group, there were significant differences between preoperative and postoperative data in the following parameters; New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, cardiothoracic ratio, mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), left atrial dimension, stroke volume index, ejection fraction and cardiac index. On the contrary, in the non-LAP group, there were significant differences between preoperative and post-operative data in the following two factors; NYHA class and PAP. The size of the left atrium in the non-LAP group remained unchanged over the course of long-term follow-up. Despite severe clinical symptoms and severely reduced cardiac function of the patients in the LAP group, cardiac function in all patients improved satisfactorily. This suggests that left atrial plication has a considerably beneficial effect on left ventricular function, and therefore, may be recommended for patients with a giant left atrium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shigenobu et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: