OBJECTIVE: To establish the validity of the Orientation Log (O-Log) by comparison with the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT). DESIGN: Correlation of daily measures of orientation. SETTING: Acute rehabilitation hospital. SUBJECTS: Sixty-eight inpatients receiving rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury (TBI). PRIMARY MEASURES: The O-Log and GOAT. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the GOAT and O-Log (r = .901, P<.001). A cutoff of 25 on the O-Log was found to be comparable with the 75 cutoff on the GOAT. The scales were equivalent in measuring duration of posttraumatic amnesia. CONCLUSIONS: The O-Log is a valid measure of orientation for people with TBI and offers some advantages in administration over the GOAT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Novack et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: