The hypothesis is that the theory of competitive strategy developed by Michael E. Porter (1) is not useful as a strategic planning tool in small business. In small and medium-sized firms, the choice between overall cost leadership, overall differentiation and focus is really not an issue, since these firms only have the focus option. A new framework is introduced to allow small firms to classify themselves and their competitors as one of four generic firm types: prospector, defender, analyzer or reactor. An application of this framework to the Canadian electrical distribution industry is discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rugman et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: