Why the study?
Response to oral anticoagulants could differ by gender, and conclusions regarding the safety and bleeding of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in females with atrial fibrillation are heterogeneous.
Do non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants improve stroke and systemic embolism prevention and safety compared to Warfarin in females with atrial fibrillation?
Do non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants improve stroke and systemic embolism prevention and safety compared to Warfarin in females with atrial fibrillation?
NOACs are more efficacious than Warfarin for stroke prevention in women with AF, though their safety and bleeding profiles remain heterogeneous and require careful risk estimation.
May support NOAC preference for stroke prevention in women with AF; leaves bleeding safety open for randomized trials.
The prevalence of atrial fibrillation is lower in females than in men, but the risk of stroke and systemic thromboembolism is comparable or even higher. Administration of anticoagulant therapy does not modify this difference. Two classes of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were studied in atrial fibrillation: direct thrombin inhibitors, like Dabigatran, and activated factor X inhibitors, like Rivaroxaban, Apixaban and Edoxaban. Response to oral anticoagulants could differ between the gender. This medication was evaluated in phase III randomized controlled trials. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have been proved more efficacious than Warfarin for stroke and systemic embolism prevention in women, but conclusions regarding the safety and the bleeding are heterogeneous. As in men, before prescribing a NOAC to a female with AF, the stroke and the bleeding risk have to be carefully estimated. It is important that future studies to be targeted on comparison between of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus Warfarin in females with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toader et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: