Why the study?
Intense exercise in athletes increases arrhythmia risk, but infrequent exercise-related symptoms make traditional monitoring devices impractical during exertion.
Does a smartphone electrocardiogram aid in diagnosing arrhythmias during exercise-related symptoms in athletes?
Does a smartphone electrocardiogram aid in diagnosing arrhythmias during exercise-related symptoms in athletes?
Smartphone ECGs are a practical and reliable tool for diagnosing infrequent, exercise-induced arrhythmias in athletes when traditional monitoring is impractical.
Supports feasibility of smartphone ECG for exercise-related arrhythmias in athletes; hypothesis-generating and needs prospective validation.
Background: While athletes are generally very fit, intense exercise can increase the risk of atrial fibrillation. Moreover, other arrhythmias such as atrial flutter or supraventricular tachycardia can cause distressing, exercise-related symptoms. Given symptoms are infrequent and may occur during intense exertion, traditional monitoring devices are often impractical to use during exercise. Smartphone electrocardiograms (ECGs) such as the Alivecor Kardia device may be the portable and reliable tool required to help identify arrhythmias in this challenging population. This case series highlights the use of such devices in aiding the diagnosis of arrhythmias in the setting of exercise-related symptoms in athletes. Case summary: The six cases in this series included one elite non-endurance athlete, two elite cricketers, one amateur middle-distance runner, and two semi-elite ultra-endurance runners, with an age range of 16-48 years. An accurate diagnosis of an arrhythmia was obtained in five cases (atrial fibrillation/flutter and supraventricular tachycardias) using the smartphone ECG, which helped guide definitive treatment. No arrhythmia was identified in the final case despite using the device during multiple symptomatic events. Discussion: arrhythmia during symptoms in one case was also highlighted, providing the athlete with the confidence to continue exercising. This reassurance and confidence across all cases is perhaps the most valuable aspect of this device, where clinicians and athletes can be more certain of reaching a diagnosis and undertaking appropriate management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jewson et al. (2022) studied this question.