This paper investigates a class of bead–rod and bead–spring models which have been proposed to describe the dynamics of an isolated macromolecule in a flowing solution. Hassager (1974 a ) has pointed out a surprising result in regard to these models: the statistical conformation of a molecule (and hence its influence on the flow) apparently depends upon whether a very stiff-springed model structure or a rigid one is used. This paradox is examined and resolved. It is shown that a unique answer is obtained by regarding the system as the classical limit of a quantum-mechanical one. The extent of the quantum influence can be characterized by a dimensionless group Q . For a ‘hot’ or ‘large’ system (for which Q → 0) the classical (stiff spring) results are recovered. The effects of the parameter Q on the size of the molecules and the rheology of the solution are calculated in detail for a simple model, and the gross features are identified for a more realistic Rouse chain model, each in both weak and strong flows. A final section considers weak, rapidly varying flows. It is shown that, within the context of classical (non-quantum) physics, for sufficiently rapid changes any model structure will tend to move with the applied flow, and therefore exert no stresses on the fluid. This explains the theoretical observation of Fixman & Evans (1976) that, in regard to the particle stress, the limits of rigidity and infinitely high frequency do not commute.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J.M. Rallison (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: