This paper presents a semi-physical parameter identification for a recently proposed enhanced iron-loss formula, the IEM-Formula. Measurements are performed on a standardized Epstein frame by the conventional field-metric method under sinusoidal magnetic flux densities up to high magnitudes and frequencies. Quasi-static losses are identified on the one hand by point-by-point dc-measurements using a flux-meter and on the other hand by extrapolating higher frequency measurements to dc magnetization using the statistical loss-separation theory (Jacobs et al., “Magnetic material optimization for hybrid vehicle PMSM drives,” in Inductica Conference, CD-Rom, Chicago/USA, 2009). Utilizing this material information, possibilities to identify the parameter of the IEM-Formula are analyzed. Along with this, the importance of excess losses in present-day non-grain oriented Fe-Si laminations is investigated. In conclusion, the calculated losses are compared to the measured losses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steentjes et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: