Why the study?
Outpatient treatment of select emergency department patients with acute PE or DVT is safe, cost-effective, and associated with high patient satisfaction, yet remains uncommon.
A multidisciplinary consensus panel provides a clinical decision framework and point-of-care tools to facilitate the safe outpatient treatment of low-risk PE and DVT.
Supports outpatient treatment of low-risk PE and DVT; extends evidence with actionable point-of-care tools.
The outpatient treatment of select emergency department patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) or deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has been shown to be safe, cost effective and associated with high patient satisfaction. Despite this, outpatient PE and DVT treatment remains uncommon. To address this, the American College of Emergency Physicians assembled a multidisciplinary team of content experts to provide evidence-based recommendations and practical advice to help clinicians safely treat patients with low-risk PE and DVT without hospitalization. The emergency clinician must stratify the patient's risk of clinical decompensation due to their PE or DVT as well as their risk of bleeding due to anticoagulation. The clinician must also select and start an anticoagulant and ensure that the patient has access to the medication in a timely manner. Reliable follow-up is critical, and the patient must also be educated about signs or symptoms that should prompt a return to the emergency department. To facilitate access to these recommendations, the consensus panel also created 2 web-based "point-of-care tools."
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kabrhel et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: