Why the study?
Does amsacrine improve remission rates in patients with solid tumors or acute nonlymphocytic leukemia?
Does amsacrine improve remission rates in patients with solid tumors or acute nonlymphocytic leukemia?
Amsacrine shows limited efficacy in solid tumors but achieves a 50-60% complete remission rate in relapsed acute nonlymphocytic leukemia when combined with high-dose cytosine arabinoside.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support amsacrine combinations as salvage in relapsed ANLL; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.
The synthetic aminoacridine derivative amsacrine (m-AMSA) is capable of preventing DNA from serving as a template in replication and DNA synthesis. This mechanism of action is similar to that of anthracyclines, but clinical evidence suggests the lack of cross-resistance. The recommended dosage in patients with solid tumors is 90-120 mg/m2 intravenously every 3-4 weeks. Despite the initial encouraging reports from experimental models, m-AMSA has shown no real impact in the treatment of patients with a wide variety of solid tumors. In relapsed acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, 20-30% of patients will achieve complete remission. An increased remission rate is obtained when m-AMSA is combined with other agents, especially with high-dose cytosine arabinoside, with a complete remission rate of 50-60% in relapsed patients. Currently, several phase III trials are evaluating m-AMSA combinations against daunorubicin-containing regimens in patients with previously untreated acute leukemia. The potential role of these regimens in this disease remains to be defined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hornedo et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: