Why the study?
Does percutaneous mitral or aortic balloon valvotomy alter cardiac conduction in patients undergoing the procedure?
Does percutaneous mitral or aortic balloon valvotomy alter cardiac conduction in patients undergoing the procedure?
Percutaneous balloon valvotomy causes transient prolongation of His-Purkinje conduction time and persistent prolongation of QRS duration, including new intraventricular conduction defects.
May warrant intraprocedural conduction monitoring during valvotomy; hypothesis-generating for arrhythmic risk in this cohort.
To evaluate the electrophysiologic changes in the cardiac conduction system that occur during percutaneous mitral or aortic balloon valvotomy, we prospectively studied the conduction system in 19 patients (10 mitral, 8 aortic, and 1 both) undergoing this procedure. A His bundle electrogram was recorded in all patients, and when sinus rhythm was present, the atrioventricular (AV) node effective refractory period was measured. Holter monitoring was performed during and for 24 hours after the procedure. Follow-up electrocardiograms (ECG) were available in 11 patients 2.3 +/- 1.5 months after the procedure. The AV node effective refractory period before (276 +/- 86 msec) and after valvotomy (298 +/- 85 msec) were not significantly different. The maximum His-Purkinje conduction time (HV interval) observed during valvotomy (66 +/- 20 msec) was significantly longer (p less than 0.01) than that measured before (57 +/- 10 msec) or after (60 +/- 18 msec) valvotomy. The mean HV intervals before and after valvotomy were not significantly different. The mean QRS complex duration increased from 95 +/- 28 to 112 +/- 28 msec during valvotomy and remained significantly prolonged (109 +/- 26 msec) 24 hours after the procedure (p less than 0.01). A new intraventricular conduction defect (QRS complex duration greater than 100 msec) or bundle branch block occurred in five of 13 patients who had normal QRS duration before the procedure. The change in HV interval did not correlate with the change in QRS complex duration. In four patients, the newly acquired intraventricular conduction defect was still present on follow-up ECG tracing. Complete heart block was not observed in any patient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlson et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: