Why the study?
Tumoral pulmonary hypertension comprises diverse subtypes in patients with current or previous malignancy that are notoriously difficult to diagnose ante mortem, have poor outcomes, and may mimic other pulmonary conditions or arise from cancer therapies.
Tumoral pulmonary hypertension should be considered in patients with unexplained PH, especially those with a history of malignancy or poor response to standard therapies.
Alerts clinicians to occult malignancy in unexplained PH; leaves open need for prospective validation and registries.
Tumoral pulmonary hypertension (PH) comprises a variety of subtypes in patients with a current or previous malignancy. Tumoral PH principally includes the tumour-related pulmonary microvascular conditions pulmonary tumour microembolism and pulmonary tumour thrombotic microangiopathy. These inter-related conditions are frequently found in post mortem specimens but are notoriously difficult to diagnose ante mortem . The outlook for patients remains extremely poor although there is some emerging evidence that pulmonary vasodilators and anti-inflammatory approaches may improve survival. Tumoral PH also includes pulmonary macroembolism and tumours that involve the proximal pulmonary vasculature, such as angiosarcoma; both may mimic pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic PH. Finally, tumoral PH may develop in response to treatments of an underlying malignancy. There is increasing interest in pulmonary arterial hypertension induced by tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as dasatanib. In addition, radiotherapy and chemotherapeutic agents such as mitomycin-C can cause pulmonary veno-occlusive disease. Tumoral PH should be considered in any patient presenting with unexplained PH, especially if it is poorly responsive to standard approaches or there is a history of malignancy. This article will describe subtypes of tumoral PH, their pathophysiology, investigation and management options in turn.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Price et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: