No AccessPerspectives on Hearing and Hearing Disorders: Research and DiagnosticsArticle1 Apr 2015The Relation Between Cochlear Neuropathy, Hidden Hearing Loss and Obscure Auditory Dysfunction Garreth Prendergast, Hannah Guest, and Christopher J. Plack Garreth Prendergast School of Psychological Sciences, University of ManchesterManchester, United Kingdom Google Scholar More articles by this author , Hannah Guest School of Psychological Sciences, University of ManchesterManchester, United Kingdom Google Scholar More articles by this author and Christopher J. Plack School of Psychological Sciences, University of ManchesterManchester, United Kingdom Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/hhd19.1.32 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Sensorineural hearing loss is typically defined by threshold elevation, often resulting from dysfunction of cochlear outer hair cells. Damage can occur as a result of ageing and noise exposure, reducing auditory sensitivity, and allowing detection using pure tone audiometry, the cornerstone of audiological testing. Yet the audiogram is limited in its ability to predict perceptual performance, especially for speech perception in noise. The deficits reported in some audiometrically normal listeners provide stark examples of this insensitivity. Recent research in animals has revealed that widespread loss of auditory nerve fibers can take place without hair cell loss or threshold elevation, as a result of either noise exposure or ageing. This pattern of damage may manifest as “hidden hearing loss” in humans, leading to perceptual deficits without affecting the audiogram. A great deal of interest is currently focused on this condition and its putative effects, which are expected to impact listening in complex auditory environments. Much work remains to be done in establishing the existence, causes, effects, and clinical relevance of hidden hearing loss in humans. However, forthcoming research findings are likely to be pivotal and may demand that we reassess our diagnostic methods, management strategies, and fundamental understanding of hearing loss. References Anderson, S., Parbery-Clark, A., White-Schwoch, T., & Kraus, N. (2013). Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds predicts self-reported speech-in-noise performance.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 31–43. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Barker, D., Hopkins, K., Baker, R., & Plack, C. J. (2014). Detecting the early effects of noise exposure. Paper presented at the Midwinter Meeting of Association for Research in Otolaryngology, San Diego, CA. Google Scholar Bharadwaj, H. M., Verhulst, S., Shaheen, L., Liberman, M. C., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2014). Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 8, 26. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Bharadwaj, H. M., Masud, S., Verhulst, S., Mehraei, G., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2015). Individual differences reveal correlates of hidden hearing deficits.Journal of Neuroscience. Google Scholar Bones, O., & Plack, C. J. (2015). Losing the music: Aging affects the perception and subcortical neural representation of musical harmony.Journal of Neuroscience, 35(9), 4071–4080. Google Scholar British Society of Audiology APD Special Interest Group. (2011). What's in a name? APD by any other name would not smell so sweet.International Journal of Audiology, 50, 496. Google Scholar Chen, W., Jongkamonwiwat, N., Abbas, L., Eshtan, S. J., Johnson, S. L., Kuhn, S., … Rivolta, M. N. (2012). Restoration of auditory evoked responses by human ES-cell-derived otic progenitors.Nature, 490, 278–282. Google Scholar Clinard, C. G., & Tremblay, K. L. (2013). Aging degrades the neural encoding of simple and complex sounds in the human brainstem.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24, 590–599. Google Scholar Davis, A. C. (1989). The prevalence of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britain.International Journal of Epidemiology, 18, 911–917. Google Scholar Dubno, J. R., Dirks, D. D., & Morgan, D. E. (1984). Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 87–96. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Füllgrabe, C., Moore, B. C. J., & Stone, M. A. (2014). Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: Contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition.Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6:347. MedlineGoogle Scholar Furman, A. C., Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2013). Noise-induced cochlear neuropathy is selective for fibers with low spontaneous rates.Journal of Neurophysiology, 110, 577–586. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Glueckert, R., Bitsche, M., Miller, J. M., Zhu, Y., Prieskorn, D. M., Altschuler, R. A., & Schrott-Fischer, A. (2008). Deafferentiation-associated changes in afferent and efferent processes in the guinea pig cochlea and afferent regeneration with chronic intrascalar brain-derived neurotrophic factor and acidic fibroblast growth factor.The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 507, 1602–1621. Google Scholar Gourevitch, B., Edeline, J. M., Occelli, F., & Eggermont, J. J. (2014). Is the din really harmless? Long-term effects of non-traumatic noise on the adult auditory system.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15, 483–491. Google Scholar Gu, J. W., Herrmann, B. S., Levine, R. A., & Melcher, J. R. (2012) Brainstem auditory evoked potentials suggest a role for the ventral cochlear nucleus in tinnitus.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 13, 819–833. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Hind, S. E., Haines-Bazrafshan, R., Benton, C. L., Brassington, W., Towle, B., & Moore, D. R. (2011). Prevalence of clinical referrals having hearing thresholds within normal limits.International Journal of Audiology, 50, 708–716. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Kim, S., Frisina, R. D., Mapes, F. M., Hickman, E. D., & Frisina, D. R. (2006). Effect of age on binaural speech intelligibility in normal hearing adults.Speech Communication, 48, 591–597. Google Scholar King, A., Hopkins, K., & Plack, C. J. (2014). The effects of age and hearing loss on interaural phase difference discriminationa).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135, 342–351. Google Scholar Konrad-Martin, D., Dille, M. F., McMillan, G., Griest, S., McDermott, D., Fausti, S. A., & Austin, D. F. (2012). Age-related changes in the auditory brainstem response.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 23, 18–35. Google Scholar Krishnan, A. (2006). Frequency-following response.In R. F Burkhard, M. Don, & J. Eggermont (Eds.). Auditory evoked potentials: Basic principles and clinical application (pp. 313–335). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Google Scholar Kujawa, S. G., & Liberman, M. C. (2009). Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss.Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 14077–14085. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Lin, H., Furman, A., Kujawa, S., & Liberman, M. C. (2011). Primary neural degeneration in the guinea pig cochlea after reversible noise-induced threshold shift.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 12, 605–616. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Liu, L., Wang, H., Shi, L., Almuklass, A., He, T., Aiken, S., … Wang, J. (2012). Silent damage of noise on cochlear afferent innervation in guinea pigs and the impact on temporal processing.PLoS ONE, 7(11), e49550. Google Scholar Lopez-Poveda, E. A., & Barrios, P. (2013). Perception of stochastically undersampled sound waveforms: A model of auditory deafferentation.Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 124. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Makary, C., Shin, J., Kujawa, S., Liberman, M. C., & Merchant, S. (2011). Age-related primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 12, 711–717. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Maison, S. F., Usubuchi, H., & Liberman, M. C. (2013). Efferent feedback minimizes cochlear neuropathy from moderate noise exposure.Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 5542–5552. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Marmel, F., Linley, D., Carlyon, R. P., Gockel, H. E., Hopkins, K., & Plack, C. J. (2013). Subcortical neural synchrony and absolute thresholds predict frequency discrimination independently.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 14, 757–766. Google Scholar May, J. J. (2000). Occupational Hearing Loss.American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 37, 112–120. Google Scholar Moore, D. R. (2011). The diagnosis and management of auditory processing disorder.Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(3), 303–308. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Moore, D. R., Edmondson-Jones, M., Dawes, P., Fortnum, H., McCormack, A., Pierzycki, R. H., & Munro, K. J. (2014). Relation between speech-in-noise threshold, hearing loss and cognition from 40–69 years of age.PLoS ONE, 9(9), e107720. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Nayagam, B. A., Edge, A. S., Needham, K., Hyakumura, T., Leung, J., Nayagam, D. A. X., & Dottori, M. (2013). An in vitro model of developmental synaptogenesis using cocultures of human neural progenitors and cochlear explants.Stem Cells and Development, 22, 901–912. Google Scholar Needham, K., Hyakumura, T., Gunewardene, N., Dottori, M., & Nayagam, B. A. (2014). Electrophysiological properties of neurosensory progenitors derived from human embryonic stem cells.Stem Cell Research, 12, 241–249. Google Scholar United States Department of Labor. (n.d.). Occupational Safety & Health Administration. Occupational Noise Exposure. 1910.95. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=standards&p_id=9735 Google Scholar Picou, E. M., Aspell, E., & Ricketts, T. A. (2014). Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.Ear and Hearing, 35, 339–352. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Plack, C. J., Barker, D., & Prendergast, G. (2014). Perceptual consequences of “hidden” hearing loss.Trends in Hearing, 18, pii: 2331216514550621. Google Scholar Pujol, R., & Puel, J.-L. (1999). Excitotoxicity, synaptic repair, and functional recovery in the mammalian cochlea: A review of recent findings.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 884, 249–254. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Ruggles, D., Bharadwaj, H., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2011). Normal hearing is not enough to guarantee robust encoding of suprathreshold features important in everyday communication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 15516–15521. Google Scholar Saunders, G. H., & Haggard, M. P. (1989). The clinical assessment of obscure auditory dysfunction-1. Auditory and psychological factors.Ear and Hearing, 10, 200–208. Google Scholar Saunders, G. H., & Haggard, M. P. (1992). The clinical assessment of “obscure auditory dysfunction” (OAD) 2. Case control analysis of determining factors.Ear and Hearing, 13, 241–254. Google Scholar Schaette, R., & McAlpine, D. (2011). Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: Physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model.Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 13452–13457. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Schmiedt, R. A., Mills, J. H., & Boettcher, F. A. (1996). Age-related loss of activity of auditory-nerve fibers.Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 2799–2803. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Sergeyenko, Y., Lall, K., Liberman, M. C., & Kujawa, S. G. (2013). Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: An early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline.Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 13686–13694. CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Song, J. H., Skoe, E., Banai, K., & Kraus, N. (2011). Perception of speech in noise: Neural correlates.Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 23, 2268–2279. Google Scholar Stephens, D., Zhao, F., & Kennedy, V. (2003). Is there an association between noise exposure and King Kopetzky Syndrome?.Noise & Health, 5, 55–62. Google Scholar Wan, G., Gómez-Casati, M. E., Gigliello, A. R., Liberman, C., & Corfas, G. (2014). Neurotrophin-3 regulates ribbon synapse density in the cochlea and induces synapse regeneration after acoustic trauma.eLife, 3, e03564. Google Scholar Zhao, F., & Stephens, D. (2007). A critical review of King-Kopetzky syndrome: Hearing difficulties, but normal hearing?.Audiological Medicine, 5, 119–124. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 19Issue 1April 2015Pages: 32-40 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library HistoryReceived: Jan 31, 2015Revised: Mar 9, 2015Accepted: Mar 10, 2015 Published in issue: Apr 1, 2015 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesleader-topicsCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2015 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prendergast et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: