Why the study?
Hypertension is largely undiagnosed, untreated, and uncontrolled in Ethiopia, and accurately assessing disease beliefs is essential to designing effective hypertension education.
A newly developed hypertension belief assessment tool demonstrated good validity and reliability for measuring health beliefs in a rural Ethiopian adult population.
Supports culturally specific hypertension belief assessment; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: In Ethiopia, the majority of hypertension cases remain undiagnosed, untreated, and uncontrolled. Beliefs about hypertension and its complications play an important role in hypertension management behaviors. Accurate assessment of individuals' beliefs towards the disease is of paramount importance in the design of hypertension education. This study aimed to develop and validate a hypertension belief assessment tool based on the Health Belief Model for the general population among rural adults in northwest Ethiopia. METHODS: The study included item construction, face and content validation, factor analysis, and establishment of reliability and validity of the tool. A total of 308 rural adults participated in the study. Inter-item and item-to-total correlations were used to examine the items assessed with the same content on a scale. Principal component analysis with promax rotation was used to extract the factors. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed using average variance extraction and maximum shared variance. RESULTS: The median age of the participants was 41 (IQR: 31-55) years. Of the participants, 175 (56.8%) were female and 287 (93.2%) were farmers. Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test value of 0.84 and significant Bartlett's test of sphericity (p=0.000) revealed that the data were suitable for exploratory factor analysis. The principal component analysis identified 6 factors, which explained 70.06% of the variation of the hypertension belief. Cronbach's alpha was 0.85 for the entire scale, ranging from 0.74 to 0.92 for the sub-domains. The average variance extracted was above 0.5 for all factors, indicating convergent validity. The maximum shared variance between the two constructs was lower than the average variance extracted from each factor, indicating that discriminating validity had been established. CONCLUSION: The hypertension belief assessment tool was found to be valid and reliable, which can be used to measure the health beliefs on hypertension for the rural adult population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teshome et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: