Solutions of the one- and two-dimensional integral equations that describe ground wave propagation are presented and compared. The one-dimensional equation is shown to be inaccurate at low frequencies for obstacles narrower than about 10 km and typical pathlengths. In such cases, the two-dimensional equation is needed to account properly for the signal's dependence on obstacle width, recovery at long distances, and transverse diffraction pattern. The one- and two-dimensional solutions approach each other at large distances beyond very wide obstacles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ella Suzanne Field (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: