The anxiolytic effects of buspirone and its major metabolite, l-(2-pyrimidinyl)-piperazine (1-PP) have been investigated with a conflict (shock-induced suppression of drinking) paradigm in rats. Buspirone (10 mg/kg, p.o.) showed an anticonflict activity with a bell-shaped dose-response relationship without any effect on spontaneous water consumption. Higher doses of buspirone reduced the punished response. Diazepam (20 and 40 mg/kg, p.o.) also showed an anticonflict activity in a dose-dependent manner, but animals with diazepam showed an increase in spontaneous water consumption at these doses. On the other hand, 1-PP (6.25-200 mg/kg, p.o.) showed a weak anticonflict activity with a significant effect at 25 mg/kg without any effect on spontaneous water consumption. In the 7-day treatment test, buspirone (5 and 10 mg/kg, p.o.), 1-PP (5 and 25 mg/kg, p.o.) and diazepam (10 and 40 mg/kg, p.o.) did not develop the tolerance to the anticonflict activity. Conversely, the anticonflict activity of diazepam was increased by the repeated treatment. Diazepam (10 mg/kg, p.o.) showed an anticonflict activity without any effect on spontaneous water consumption in this test. These results demonstrated that buspirone clearly exhibited an anticonflict effect similar to that of diazepam in a Vogel-type conflict test, and its real anxiolytic effect may not be always based on 1-PP, the main metabolite of buspirone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amano et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: