Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Optimum simple step-stress accelerated life testing plans have practical limitations. They highly depend upon the assumption of a linear relationship between stress and time-to-failure and use only two extreme stresses that can cause irrelevant failure modes. Thus, 3-step plans are preferable. In this paper, the authors derive the optimum quadratic plan and propose and evaluate a 3-step test plan, the compound linear, as an alternative to the optimum simple step-stress plan and optimum quadratic plan. The compound linear plan is better than two compromise plans proposed for constant stress testing and nearly as good as a proposed optimum compromise plan, the advantage being its simplicity. A small sample-size study shows that the efficiency of the test plan is not appreciably affected by the sample size, so that the asymptotic results are a good indication of the performance in sample sizes encountered in practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khamis et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: