Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations are irregular and heterogeneous. RESULTS: The correlations between NFκB/STAT3-GFP transcription and [Ca(2+)](i) spike amplitude/cumulative spike duration are revealed by simultaneous monitoring in single cells and validated in cell population. CONCLUSION: [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations regulate transcription through [Ca(2+)](i) spike amplitude and cumulative spike duration. SIGNIFICANCE: How irregular [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations control transcription is crucial for understanding biological [Ca(2+)](i) signal-regulated events. Agonist-stimulated [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations are universally irregular in their kinetics. How irregular [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations dynamically regulate agonist-stimulated downstream events has not been studied. To overcome the obstacles of irregularity and heterogeneity of [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations, agonist-stimulated [Ca(2+)](i) signaling and NFκB/STAT3-GFP nuclear translocation were simultaneously monitored in each single cell examined. The cause-effect relationship between [Ca(2+)](i) oscillation parameters and transcriptional activities was validated in cell populations through irregular [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations with varied parameters. The time duration of cumulative [Ca(2+)](i) elevations reaching the threshold [Ca(2+)](i) level for a transcriptional factor activation and [Ca(2+)](i) spike amplitude was found to control agonist-stimulated transcription and gene expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: