This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The aim of the study was to compare the effect of salivary pellicle modification with polyphenol-rich solutions containing fluoride on enamel erosion and abrasion. Human enamel specimens (n = 14/group) were assigned to five pellicle-modifying groups: GSE+F (grape seed extract +500 ppm F-); CRA+F (cranberry extract +500 ppm F-); NaF (sodium fluoride solution -5 00ppm F-); Sn+F (commercial solution, SnCl2/NaF/AmF); and DW (deionized water, negative control). The specimens were submitted to 5 cycles, each one consisting of pellicle formation (120μl, 30 min, 37°C, no agitation), followed by pellicle modification with the experimental solutions (5 ml, 2 min, 25ºC, 70 rpm), and subsequent salivary pellicle formation (120 μl, 60 min, 37°C, no agitation). The specimens were then submitted to erosion (1% citric acid, 10 ml, 1 min, pH 3.6, 70 rpm, 25ºC). Subsequently, they were submitted to abrasion with a fluoride-based toothpaste slurry in a toothbrushing machine (50 strokes, 200 g load, 2 min exposed to slurry). The enamel surface was evaluated with an optical profilometer at baseline and after the 5 cycles to assess the surface loss. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis followed by a multiple comparisons test (α = 0.05). Significant differences were found between the tested solutions (p <0.001). The highest surface loss was verified in the DW group (p < 0.001). The other tested solutions (GSE+F, CRA+F, Sn+F, NaF) promoted significant enamel protection against the erosive-abrasive challenges with no differences between them. In conclusion, the modification of salivary pellicle with both polyphenol-rich, commercial solution and fluoride solutions were able to protect the enamel surface from erosion and abrasion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mailart et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: