Key result
FDA Early Feasibility Studies advance device innovation, but institutional and enrollment delays persist.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review highlights the progress and remaining administrative and enrollment challenges in the U.S. FDA Early Feasibility Studies program for cardiovascular devices.
The development of technology to treat unmet clinical patient needs in the United States has been an important focus for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the 2016 Congressional 21st Century Cures Act. In response, a program of early feasibility studies (EFS) has been developed. One of the important issues has been the outmigration of the development and testing of medical devices from the United States. The EFS committee has developed and implemented processes to address issues to develop strategies for early treatment of these patient groups. Initial implementation of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration EFS program has been successful, but residual significant problems have hindered the opportunity to take full advantage of the program. These include delays in gaining Institutional Review Board approval, timeliness of budget and contractual negotiations, and lack of access to and enrollment of study subjects. This paper reviews improvements that have been made to the U.S. EFS ecosystem and outlines potential approaches to address remaining impediments to program success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holmes et al. (2020) reported a review. Early feasibility studies (EFS) program was evaluated. The U.S. FDA Early Feasibility Studies program has improved the cardiovascular device ecosystem, though challenges like IRB delays, budget negotiations, and enrollment issues remain.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: