A retrospective assessment of 809 patients operated on in 1990-1998 was performed. A patient-based outcome questionnaire also was incorporated into the study. The outcome was graded according to the Functional Economic Rating scale. A total of 64% of the patients were relieved of their complaints 3.2-10.2 years (median 6.3 years) after lumbar disc surgery. An excellent outcome, defined as Prolo scale of 9 or 10, was achieved in 55.8%, a good outcome (Prolo scale 7 or 8) in 20.7%, a fair outcome (Prolo scale 5 or 6) in 11.4%, and a poor outcome (Prolo scale of </=4) in 12.1% of the patients. Patients with strenuous occupations had a significantly (P = 0.004) less favorable outcome than patients with less strenuous or sedentary occupations. Criteria for evaluating the results of treating lumbar spinal disorders vary widely. A more universal acceptance of common criteria for judging the outcome of spinal operations should facilitate comparisons among various methods of treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoeggl et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: