Retrospective study demonstrates lower fusion rates and worse pain relief after two-level fusion involving the lumbosacral segment, suggesting a need for sacral anchor reinforcement.
STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to investigate the fusion rate and clinical outcomes of 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PLIF provides favorable clinical outcomes and a high fusion rate. However, most extant studies have been limited to the results of single-level PLIF. Clinical outcomes and fusion rate of 2-level PLIF are unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 73 patients who underwent 2-level PLIF below L3 between 2008 and 2016 (follow-up period >2 y) were included. Patients were divided into the 2 groups on the basis of surgical level. The lumbar group included 48 patients who underwent L3/4/5 PLIF, and the lumbosacral group included 25 patients who underwent L4/5/S PLIF. Fusion rate and clinical outcomes were compared. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and a visual analog scale were used for evaluation. RESULTS: Fusion rate was significantly lower in the lumbosacral group (lumbar 96% vs. lumbosacral 64%; P<0.001). Eight of 9 cases of pseudarthrosis occurred at the lumbosacral segment. Improvement in the mental health domain of the JOAPEQ was significantly lower in the lumbosacral group (lumbar 16 vs. lumbosacral 10; P=0.02). The VAS data showed that improvements in the following variables were significantly lower in the lumbosacral group than in the lumbar group: pain in low back (lumbar -38 vs. lumbosacral -23; P=0.004), pain in buttocks or lower leg (lumbar -48 vs. lumbosacral -29; P=0.04), and numbness in buttocks or lower leg (lumbar -44 vs. lumbosacral -33; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Two-level PLIF at the lumbosacral segment demonstrated a significantly lower fusion rate and poorer clinical outcomes than that at the lumbar-only segments. Some reinforcement for the sacral anchor is recommended to improve fusion rate, even for short fusion like 2-level PLIF, if the lumbosacral segment is included. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujimori et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: